Trust is the whole product. This page explains how we verify what we publish and how we handle it when a claim needs to change.
Sources we trust
- Official product docs, changelogs, pricing pages and model cards.
- Peer-reviewed research and reputable preprints (with clear caveats).
- First-party benchmarks published by model providers, cross-referenced with independent evaluations.
- Named on-the-record sources for reporting.
Sources we don't rely on
- Uncredited screenshots, viral posts, and second-hand summaries.
- AI-generated "facts" that we can't trace to a primary source.
- Anonymous claims for high-stakes reporting.
Our verification process
- Every factual claim is traced to a primary source before publish.
- Numbers, pricing, model names and dates are checked against the vendor's live site.
- Screenshots and quotes are dated. If we can't confirm a quote, we don't publish it.
- Reviews are based on hands-on testing — not on marketing pages.
Updates and corrections
- Every article shows a last-updated timestamp when meaningful changes are made.
- Material corrections are noted at the bottom of the article, with what changed and when.
- Minor corrections (typos, formatting) are silent.
Report an error
Spotted something wrong? Please tell us. Use the contact form, include the article URL and the correction, and we aim to review within two business days.